Jira Service Desk 3.16.x Long Term Support release performance report
This page compares the performance of Jira Service Desk 3.9.10 and Jira Service Desk 3.16 Long Term Support release.
About Long Term Support releases
We recommend upgrading Jira Service Desk regularly. That said, if your organisation's process means you only upgrade about once a year, upgrading to a Long Term Support release may be a good option, as it provides continued access to critical security, stability, data integrity and performance issues until this version reaches end of life.
Performance
Jira Service Desk 3.16 was not focused solely on performance, but we aim to provide the same, if not better, performance with each release. In this section, we’ll compare Jira Service Desk 3.9.10 to Jira Service Desk 3.16 Long Term Support release, for both Server and Data Center. We ran the same extensive test scenario for both Jira versions.
The following table presents mean response times of individual actions performed in Jira Service Desk. To check the details of these actions and the Jira instance they were performed in, see Testing methodology.
The performance was measured under a user load we estimate to be peak traffic, on a 5,000 agent instance.
Response times for Jira Service Desk actions (in seconds)
Action | 3.9.10 Server | 3.16.1 Server | 3.9.10 Data Center | 3.16.1 Data Center |
---|---|---|---|---|
View workload report (medium) | 39.39 | 3.85 | 22.74 | 3.54 |
View workload report (small) | 1.054 | 0.908 | 1.094 | 0.793 |
View requests | 1.691 | 1.289 | 1.140 | 1.099 |
View portals page | 1.650 | 1.594 | 1.442 | 1.564 |
View welcome guide | 0.693 | 0.620 | 0.683 | 0.562 |
View created vs. resolved report | 1.440 | 1.335 | 1.320 | 1.141 |
View time to resolution report | 3.060 | 2.939 | 2.769 | 2.619 |
Invite team | 2.671 | 2.698 | 2.623 | 2.636 |
View customers page | 1.649 | 1.688 | 1.603 | 1.609 |
View queues with SLAs | 19.12 | 20.15 | 11.42 | 11.86 |
View queue: All open issues | 37.85 | 38.90 | 33.75 | 34.44 |
Create customer request | 23.61 | 24.97 | 17.72 | 18.85 |
View service desk issue | 1.780 | 2.133 | 1.352 | 1.469 |
In summary
It's great news for reports , with some showing huge improvements! Other key actions have also substantially improved. Highlights:
- Viewing workload report improved by 80-90%
- Viewing created vs resolved report improved by 5-15%
- Viewing time to resolution report improved by 5-15%
- Viewing requests improved 20-30%
- Viewing portals page improved by 5-15%
- View welcome guide improved by 5-15%
For all remaining actions, performance looks similar between the two versions, with slight degradations, of around one second or less, observed when viewing the following: queues, issues, customers, and when creating a customer request.
We'll continue to invest in improving future performance, so that service desk teams can move with ease through their workspace, and our largest customers can confidently scale.
Testing methodology
The following sections detail the testing environment, including hardware specification, and methodology we used in our performance tests.